Chapter Sixty Seven: The Bibliography of Lowland Monsters

Within the official classification of the Bibliography of Urban Legends carefully kept by the complete library of records of the Society, there are two major categories of monsters mentioned as it was derived from the majority of myths and legends as duly enumerated therein: one is known as the Highland Monsters and the other is aptly called the Lowland Monsters.

There are major differences noted between both sides of the classification as reflected in the Society's most secretive annotations; but while the Society of Urban Legends Pte. Ltd. has put careful consideration in updating its records of harms and benefits from the qualities of these observed monsters, however, there had been notable oversight that was later on discovered officially reflected in the books by the independent report of higher authorities in the form of a due diligence audit.

The observed audit findings focused on the anomalies of an organized scheme in a deliberate attempt to fraudulently alter several records (most of them were even dated centuries ago, willfully committed by way of deletion or addition of annotations made in the authorized Bibliography) which includes the (simulated) attached evidence as embodied in the certified true copy of the screenplays of films, allegedly perpetuated to secretly influence the Society's method of assignments in the discovery of hidden activities (of monsters in particular) within the realm of the Urban Legends in its most general form.

The furnished copy of the Audit Report further discussed the standard definition of the noted schemes designed to hide the major qualities and characteristics inherent to the Lowland Monsters's inability to adequately defend itself, such that they were villified more in the carrying out of orders in command than, instead, of the Society's pluralistic agents focusing more of their resources to counter the cunning rituals of the much sinister Highland Monsters.

Beneath the Lowland Underworld was the rising fear of the Society's use of unnecessary brute force in its capture of their kind (which was later on outlawed by subsequent statutes), and most of them were predisposed of being used as an escapegoat for more evil purposes; it is mainly due to the lack of judicially protected boundaries covering the influence of the many forces of the derivatives developed from chants, letters, agreements, and Rhetoric that was seen insufficient, as it is involuntarily being applied to alter their own metaphysical right to existence.

A substantive anomaly was strongly emphasized in the said audit report within a much broader sense, and the Bibiliography has been flagged by the auditing jurisdiction to be "tampered, unreliable, and full of methods of falsehoods" and was indefinitely barred to be continued to be updated without the conduct of proper investigation for the purpose in order to sufficiently identify the intent of the fraud committed within the sphere of ethics and responsibility.

As the Field Auditors expressed their alarm and concern over the reliability of the Records System employed by the Society, a Memorandum Circular has been released to temporarily "close the Book and the suitable entries therein to be held in abeyance" until an officially sanctioned investigation has been thoroughly conducted to discover the intricacies of the identified fradulent scheme, with the details of the investigative methodology and findings to be submitted to the Executive Clerk of the Audit Committee of the governing Federated Societies & Urban Legends as accredited byvthe Story Board. Meanwhile, the same Committee authorized the act of causing a new Book "to temporarily hold important records" until conditions are certain that the integrity of the original Book of the Bibliography is no longer compromised.

Nevertheless, it was never fully ascertained by the Auditor-in-Charge why the explanation it received from the audit observation that there has been a confusion on how the Highland Monsters behave as opposed to the Lowlanders that they were "unintentionally" favored by the scheme cobsequently identified in the audit findings when it was quite clear that their most notable differences are clearly definite in its "form and essence," and that there is no close resemblance on the two classes of Monsters for the claim in the said reply to warrant merit that the agents of the Society will be gravely mistaken identifying the difference (as the characteristics were formally defined), either through the language or through the logic used in the said clarificatory guidelines for authorizing truthful entry into the records.

x-----------x

This Chapter is sponsored by Fendi.